Ovidio Blanco testimony as a witness in litigation that keeps ' Cabueñes SOS' against the City of Gijón
The former municipal chief architect Ovid White, accused in an alleged case of urban corruption, you must report to the administrative litigation brought by the Platform Against the Wall Cabueñes ('SOS Cabueñes') against the City of Gijón Partial Plan under that parish Gijon and laying plans to build about 600 homes. Next to him the other also will architect who worked with White in the drafting of the Plan, Maria Camelia Soto.
This is by accepting the Third Section of the Division of Administrative Disputes Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Asturias (TSJA) the witnesses proposed by ' Cabueñes SOS' judgments as to which access has been Europa Press.
should be noted that White is charged with the crimes of bribery, influence peddling and insider trading linked to the award of 600,000 euros in gains from the sale of land included in that Plan Parcial. Still awaits the judge's decision on whether to close the case or ordering the initiation of proceedings against him.
As for his participation as a witness in litigation against this decision TSJA of December 7, 2010, developers involved in the Partial Plan Barajas Cabueñes-Lomas, Reyal Urbis, Beyos Place, Sole, Moro Promotions Playa de Gijon and Real Estate, submitted an appeal against that were called to testify on both Witnesses took the view that a test would be "useless " that would add nothing to the case at hand. According to the resource
, dated Dec. 22, the Platform neighborhood I wanted to show the witness was that the Partial Plan drafted talking about 54 or 64 percent of the ownership of the land, when really " that percentage was never reached . " Moreover, it is argued that the actual percentage can be seen through the documentary and says he also recognizes 'SOS Cabueñes ', so no need to call to testify to the architects who wrote it.
In fact, it is emphasized the notice of appeal that it is not mandatory to have a minimum when an urban planning of these characteristics. In this sense, it insists that confuses Platform urban planning phase with the Urban Management, which is establishing the Compensation Board. It is in this second phase that is mandatory hold at least 50 percent of the land for the adoption of the Draft Action Plan.
However, the appeal was dismissed last 19 days, to understand that platform, as the initiator of this litigation, has requested the evidence they saw fit, without prejudice the valuation of the same make later in court.
addition to the statement of the two architects ' Cabueñes SOS' has also required documentary evidence, as it required made by the City of Gijón to developers to provide documentary proof of land ownership included in the Enforcement Unit, which, according to the Platform , not done.
Posted in What the January 28, 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment